I want to thank Crying Wolf and others for confirming that racism is still alive and well. Without these occasional glimpses into their distorted minds one might be tricked into believing racism doesn’t exist. Fortunately, my research and experience keeps me well in the know. I consider myself a firm believer in free speech and cherish everyone’s right to an opinion. However, I take issue when racists like Crying Wolf regurgitate the same old hegemonic rhetoric that was first concocted by European colonizers centuries ago. Clearly this type of nonsense has perpetuated generations of racists and has attempted to justify their horrific imprint on human history such as: 1) the complete and total annihilation of indigenous populations throughout the world via disease and out right massacre; 2) the capture, enslavement, torture, rape and debasement of millions of African children, women and men; 3) the exploitation and racketeering of the planet’s natural resources. European colonizers executed these atrocities in the name of their religions, kingdoms and their astonishing self-ascribed sense of superiority which has entitled them to do, think, and say whatever they wanted, to whomever they pleased, whenever they wanted as often as they desired.

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You all (crying wolf, paul, BG) have a lot to learn from POLYGLOT. READ, LEARN, BECOME ENLIGHTENED!!!!!

to the people who think this ad is racist then I suggest don’t fuel the fire and bitch about the ad just ignore it, as easy as that.

last time I notice there are more important things happening in the world to bitch and moan about than a stupid Sony Ad.

Unfortunately it’s like talking to a wall. For example in response to your very informed entry, CW says: yawn. See, like talking to a wall. The kind of people that think Fox News is ….news. Well, maybe someone out there learned something though.

yawn.

July 9th, 2006 at 10:06 pm
Again, I’m so glad that racism is finally over! I’ve told all my friends!

Cry Wolf says:
“Umm, Stephen, you do realize that so-called “normal look

…instead of coming down on me for saying that “normal” blacks are tribal Africans, why not ask Stephen what HE meant by it? Seriously…what does that bring to YOUR mind, Lisa? To me, when someone talks about someone/something being “normal”, I tend to think of whomever/whatever it is being the way it’s originally supposed to be, which doesn’t include versions that are mixed with other things. For instance, if someone were to use the term “normal white”, I’d think of someone with pure European ancestry…NOT someone with a little black, a little Indian, etc.. Whatever, though…I know it’s difficult to have an intelligent conversation with someone who’s offended by everything, so I expected nothing more from you.

Also, it doesn’t surprise me in the slightest that you go along with that “if a minority says that it’s racism, it’s racism…and ONLY they can determine that” bullshit. So, if I’m walking down the street minding my own business and some black crackhead approaches me for a handout and I choose to ignore him, he can call me a “racist”…and God forbid anyone disagree with him, since he’s black and I’m white and only HE can determine whether or not racist thoughts were going through MY mind when I failed to pay attention to him, right?

And about that stupid “rape” analogy (I swear, the more I read your post, the more I wondered how you even figured out how to operate a keyboard and write all that idiocy)…accused rapists usually DO deny having raped someone when they’re accused of it, but rape is an actual crime, which is why trials typically follow an alleged rape…you know, in order to determine whether or not one actually happened? Since racism, by itself, isn’t actually a crime (unless you’re talking about “hate crimes”, but those are almost always associated with actions that are illegal), a trial doesn’t typically follow, so the ONLY thing that fair and logical people have to go on is the word of he who knows best (which is, the alleged perpetrator). Sure, you could say, “If he’s a racist, he’s probably a liar, too,”…but YOU DON’T KNOW if the accused is a racist, so YOU COULDN’T POSSIBLY KNOW if he’s also a liar based on the supposition (which may very well be false) that he’s a racist! The problem is, minorities want SO BAD to be able to determine who’s racist and who’s not, they’ll go to ANY asinine extreme to give themselves the benefit of the doubt, NO MATTER WHAT…even if it means that the innocent shall suffer (as long as the innocent is white, that is).

Finally (not directed at you this time, Lisa), about the Native Americans having had their land “stolen” from them by whites…whites did to the Native Americans what their own various tribes had been doing to each other thousands of years (fighting with each other, taking one another’s land, etc.). Why was it suddenly a bad thing when whites came over here and did it? What, just because we had superior weapons and whatnot, it was “wrong” of us to come over here and win land in battle? Isn’t that the whole point of wars…for one side to come up with better weapons and/or tactics, and try to win based upon that? Why did the Atlantic Ocean make a difference?

You know what I think? I think that people who bitch about whites having “stolen” land from the Native Americans are racist against whites, since those same people don’t also bitch about Native Americans having “stolen” land from other Native Americans before whites ever got here.

Put that in your peace-pipe and smoke it…

it takes me back to a commercial in which a couple was going thru mexican immigration and they showed the mexican officials pull out their wallets filled with baby pictures. implying that all mexicans do is have a ton of children.

how the white mind thinks…

the white woman holding the black woman face =dominance, power

role reversal…

black woman holding a white woman face= aggression, hostile

Yeah, Im offended… at how the world is SO oversensitive to crap like this… but turn a blind eye to *real problems*.

Complaining at stuff like this is just fueling the problem. And Im offended the NAACP refuse to realize this.

Sony will only publish ’shock’ if the public is ’shocked’. Get a brain people.

Cry Wolf says:
“Umm, Stephen, you do realize that so-called “normal look

“The biggest problem is she looks like a slave… They could’ve gotten just a normal look black female instead of her.”

Umm, Stephen, you do realize that so-called “normal look” black females bear an even closer resemblance to tribal Africans (because, if they’re “normal” blacks, they ARE tribal Africans) than that woman in the PSP ad, don’t you? If you were thinking of someone like Halle Berry…well, she could probably bleed out the scant amount of “black” blood she has in her if she were to cut herself shaving.

Big deer said:

“…people who weren’t born, or has lived as a black person for the past two hundred years have not right to talk about what is and isn’t racist. How can you possible understand how it feels to be told that you are inferior to another based only on skin color.”

Where the fuck did this ignorant idea suddenly come from in which ONLY minorities should be able to determine what is and isn’t “racist”? I’ll tell you right now, that’d be the worst mistake that we, as a society, could possibly make, because, as I mentioned in an earlier post here, the minority criteria for “racism” is some of the most unfounded crap I’ve ever heard in my life.

As an example, I was talking to a black chick I knew a while back, and she claimed to be the victim of “racism” because some white chick was handing out fliers on her college campus, and neglected to give one to the black chick. There could’ve been a thousand reasons why the white chick in question didn’t give a flier to the black chick in question (she may have been talking/yawning/scratching her ass as the black chick walked by, she may have realized that there was an inaccuracy printed on the fliers and didn’t want to give out any more until it was corrected, she may have suddenly gone into a cataleptic seizure, etc.), but, of course, it just HAD to be because of “racism” according to the black chick.

Anyway, for all of you with an IQ higher than that of a houseplant, I’ll remind you that the ONLY person who knows FOR SURE whether or not “racism” has taken place is the alleged (and I use that term strongly) “racist”. If it’s the other way around as so many claim (with ONLY the alleged victim of “racism” knowing whether or not another person had racist intentions), why are many minority groups notoriously poor? They should go to Las Vegas and use that telepathy of theirs to make a bundle!