<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zelda Timeline Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/</link>
	<description>Game News For the Masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:06:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-35555</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s21463.gridserver.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/#comment-35555</guid>
		<description>The timeline was NOT great. While most of it seems plausible they made a major error in the Oracle games.

They DEPEND on each other in a lot of ways, the opposite adventure is constantly referenced to (especially in a linked game) and getting the true ending requires completion of both for storyline reasons.

There is no way they happened in different Hyrules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The timeline was NOT great. While most of it seems plausible they made a major error in the Oracle games.</p>
<p>They DEPEND on each other in a lot of ways, the opposite adventure is constantly referenced to (especially in a linked game) and getting the true ending requires completion of both for storyline reasons.</p>
<p>There is no way they happened in different Hyrules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-30937</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s21463.gridserver.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/#comment-30937</guid>
		<description>The timeline was great. I think they need to do another one this time including phantom hourglass and twilight princess. I think  Link to the Past should be in Hyrule B and so should TP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The timeline was great. I think they need to do another one this time including phantom hourglass and twilight princess. I think  Link to the Past should be in Hyrule B and so should TP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anuban</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>Anuban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s21463.gridserver.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... this seemed to be overlooked so maybe people will read it here:

&quot;Whatever you do NEVER EVER have any confidence in the reviews given by Digital Entertainment News. There is NO WAY IN H-E-L-L anyone can convince me they were NOT paid off. No way. I have checked all the reviews and no other site had such a HUGE discrepancy in their reviews of the two games than this site.

They gave Gears a 95% or 9.5/10 while giving Zelda only a meager 8.1. Can you believe that! They just single-handedly almost made the respective overall scores equal. This is an OUTRAGE and there is no way that was an impartial review. I will never patronize that site again. Even Game was within 5 points of both games (though I do question them giving TP an 85 which really affected the average) … wow. I hope someone in the gaming industry who has a blog or does editorials points this glaring bias out. It is truly unbelievable. So watch and see … I am almost positive it won’t stop until Gears is actually a bit ahead of TP on the game rankings … and I know Mark Rein is behind this …&quot;

For the entire post check the old thread about more Gears games not just Three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230; this seemed to be overlooked so maybe people will read it here:</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever you do NEVER EVER have any confidence in the reviews given by Digital Entertainment News. There is NO WAY IN H-E-L-L anyone can convince me they were NOT paid off. No way. I have checked all the reviews and no other site had such a HUGE discrepancy in their reviews of the two games than this site.</p>
<p>They gave Gears a 95% or 9.5/10 while giving Zelda only a meager 8.1. Can you believe that! They just single-handedly almost made the respective overall scores equal. This is an OUTRAGE and there is no way that was an impartial review. I will never patronize that site again. Even Game was within 5 points of both games (though I do question them giving TP an 85 which really affected the average) … wow. I hope someone in the gaming industry who has a blog or does editorials points this glaring bias out. It is truly unbelievable. So watch and see … I am almost positive it won’t stop until Gears is actually a bit ahead of TP on the game rankings … and I know Mark Rein is behind this …&#8221;</p>
<p>For the entire post check the old thread about more Gears games not just Three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s21463.gridserver.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this was pretty cool, I saw it like 2-3 weeks ago... I especially like the idea about the split timeline in OoT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this was pretty cool, I saw it like 2-3 weeks ago&#8230; I especially like the idea about the split timeline in OoT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monir</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>monir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s21463.gridserver.com/2006/11/29/zelda-timeline-explained/#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>gametrailers.com have 6 episodes on zelda, you can find them on spikedhumor.com, search for zelda retrospective.  its quite cool to watch the changes to the game and the timeleine theory sounds plausable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gametrailers.com have 6 episodes on zelda, you can find them on spikedhumor.com, search for zelda retrospective.  its quite cool to watch the changes to the game and the timeleine theory sounds plausable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
