Mass Effect To Feature 70h Of Gameplay

12 Responses

1. monir

   February 12th, 2007 at 8:42 am

   1

   70 hours single player= yum. but does it actually take that long? doubt it. tales of symphonia supposedly had 80 hours of gameplay, 50 of those is main story, i completed it on my first try in 30.

   whats the new zelda like anyone, is it as long as said?

2. Alex

   February 12th, 2007 at 9:06 am

   2

   I completed Twilight Princess in just over 30 hours, and I didn’t do any side quests. I’ve been playing daily now for a month just doing the side quests, bit by bit. I must’ve spent at least 50 hours on the game, and there are still things explore, albeit only a few.

3. monir

   February 12th, 2007 at 10:15 am

   3

   so it is long for a solely single player game. i’ll probably get it when/if i get a wii.

4. Monarky

   February 12th, 2007 at 12:22 pm

   4

   Yeah Mass Effect will feature 70Wii Hours of Xsnots playing. That’s why I’ll just wait for it to come to the Sony PS3. They are already talking both Mass Effect and Bio Shock coming to PS3! Along with Saints and the loss of the killer War Devil must have really piled shit in your pants.

   Now we PS3 fans get the great news that “Crysis” is not only NOT going to X360, but is a PS3 console exclusive like War Devil!

   What next???? hmmmm… well nothing else I want in the X360’s weak game lineup! LOL heeheee ah…ha….ha….ha……

5. Jim2k

   February 12th, 2007 at 5:39 pm

   5

   Mass Effect ain’t coming to the PS3 you brainwashed fanboy, Microsoft is the publisher. Go find another game to “wish” for the PS3.

6. Anuban

   February 12th, 2007 at 8:14 pm

   6

   Yep this is coming from Bioware via Microsoft Game Studios so there is NO way this game will ever see any time on the PS3. Maybe Bioshock since 2K games is the publisher but never Mass Effect and still so far no concrete confirmation that Crysis will be on the PS3 as well. I am not saying it won’t but I also know that Crytek is working on something for the PS3 that is NOT Crysis and that is where I think the confusion on the net comes from.

7. tidles

   February 12th, 2007 at 9:01 pm

   7

   Hey Monarky, its IS coming out for the 360… now if your lucky son, your black breadin ‘might’ get a 360 conversion… cross your fingers fan buy!

8. Monarky

   February 12th, 2007 at 9:29 pm

   8

   I wouldn’t want it, it’s been tainted by Microselfish. M$ and their rubbish just waiting to be put in the dumpster, once we get some games rolling with CTM! Developers now changing their minds and as time passes “Close To Metal” will be in most all games. RapidMind is changing how we think about programing for all games and applicatons on multiple core processors. Eventually even Microsoft will admit they’ve been beaten.

   With Microsoft’s grubby hands on Mass Effect it can never be a great game. Look at their past. Mediocre is the best they can do!

   You can mark my words on Crysis for PS3! Notice there has been no denial announced to the claim! CTM and OpenGL could outshine the PC with fewer resources, that M$ themselves can’t touch!

9. Zac

   February 12th, 2007 at 9:36 pm

   9

   “I wouldn’t want it, it’s been tainted by Microselfish.”

   Proof of your close-mindedness.

   Basicly: “I won’t eat it because it has green on the wrapper.”

   It doesn’t matter who MAKES the game, Monarky, it matters how GOOD the actual game is.

10. Dave

    February 13th, 2007 at 11:11 am

    10

    I for one am looking forward to playing assassin’s creed exclusively on the PS3! Muahahahaa…oh wait

11. Zac

    February 13th, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    11

    There is no difference between console games and PC games except the screen and controls.

12. Tanbir C

    April 6th, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    12

    Anyone else think its going to be a bit odd, for them to have that type of graphic and large environment.. vs.. the space on the DVD9.. Look at Gears of War.. only 6 hours of game play.. I don’t see how its going to be more then 12 hours of game play at best.