Comments on: Next-Gen Games: Non-Profitable

By: Monarky

Monarky — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:19:26 +0000

Every game console generation has a bunch of crybaby developers, wetting Attends diapers over changes and having to learn something new. No different this time!

It’s like dragging kids into the dentists, they can come up with some pretty dumb excuses. Then in the end they are all smiling with those sugarless lollipops or gag toys to shut’em up, while they’re walking out the door!

By: Nasir Amin

Nasir Amin — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:39:10 +0000

It has been awarded as Game of the Year of 2006, I know that their making hell lot of money.

By: Jim2k

Jim2k — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:09:39 +0000

Of course they’re making money, come on. If they didn’t make money, no one would make games in the first place.

By: Nasir Amin

Nasir Amin — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:19:30 +0000

They do, I think that you are misunderstanding the whole case.

By: Eric

Eric — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:58:52 +0000

Wait so Gears of War isn’t making money?

By: Anuban

Anuban — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:34:29 +0000

“Games should be balanced more, I agree. Some games its like they don’t put any effort into the story or plot, just as long as it looks pretty and you get to kill something, it’ll be fun”

Did somebody say Gears of War?

By: Evander

Evander — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 04:00:03 +0000

I agree with monir, the movie industry definately is losing ideas, just look at all the comics made into movies. And there certainly are too many sequels.

Games should be balanced more, I agree. Some games its like they don’t put any effort into the story or plot, just as long as it looks pretty and you get to kill something, it’ll be fun.
Thats why I like the GTA series, there are multiple things to do and isn’t restricted.

By: Quartecks

Quartecks — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:06:49 +0000

It needs to be balanced.

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:57:09 +0000

“Far more better” *snort*

By: Anthony Vasquez

Anthony Vasquez — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:31:44 +0000

that beacause most players are atracted to the graphics..they think since is has good graphics it most have good gameplay. And most of the time thats true..:D but then there are those who like better gameplay and have crappy graphics….

By: Nasir Amin

Nasir Amin — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:17:49 +0000

Juiced was a good game, too bad it was not popular. I`ve tried S.T.A.L.K.E.R Closed Beta and I have to say that the game has potential. The game didn`t have any type of decent gameplay, the only positive thing was the graphics.
Game developers has set graphic to top priority, meanwhile the gameplay is set into the shadows.

By: Jamie Violette

Jamie Violette — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:04:58 +0000

lol, id have to agree with you guys on this, the games that have been delivered have been, by far, not top notch, especially for a wrestling fan like myself, THQ has failed me over and over, with the same game, just with better graphics…

By: Gibran Nawaz

Gibran Nawaz — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:00:16 +0000

monir, I’d say that there are still some developers who are making some nice games, like for portable systems. But I guess that is because there are lower development costs for projects like that.

By: monir

monir — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:57:56 +0000

thats probably why there’s been less innovation in games in the past few years, same goes for films, i think they’re running out of real decent ideas and decide to just up graphics, or in films case have more explosions.