Crysis Physics Cooler than Half Life 2’s?

6 Responses

1. monir

   December 15th, 2007 at 9:24 am

   1

   That was brilliant, i was hoping there would be an explosion one, and it didn’t disappoint.

2. Mike from NY

   December 16th, 2007 at 5:37 pm

   2

   WOW… Man, CMON… that is SICK! I try not to brag about too many things but god damn that is fucking awesome! I wonder what hardware this guy has to allow that many calculations to go on without dogging the system!? PhsyX card? Intel Quad Core Xtreme Edition? Whats going on here… more feedback is needed. That is pretty impressive. Atleast I think so. Try and drop tons of bodies in Garrys Mod and let them pile up on each other. That dogs my system pretty bad. Wonder how that would do on this guys system.

3. Andrew

   June 9th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

   3

   I ripped his specs from youtube, here they are:

   Windows Vista 32 Bit
   CPU: Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
   RAM: 2.00 GB Patriot DDR2 2GB Kit, PC8500 1066MHz
   Graphic: 1 x GigaByte NX8800Ultra, 768MB 2160/612MHz
   NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

   I think the 2.4 Quad core is very, very impresive. (I wish I had $5000+ to spare) Although, the video is a rendering, not live gameplay. Looks live doesn’t it? I was surrprised when I found out that it wasn’t.

4. John Prince

   June 30th, 2008 at 9:44 am

   4

   Mike, that’s just optimization. Crysis’s physics engine is VERY optimized, allowing for more physics calculations going on at once than Havok (Source’s core physics engine) allows. Personally, I think that Source and CryENGINE 2 are both equal, in their own little ways.

5. Stefan

   September 5th, 2008 at 7:00 am

   5

   @Andrew. $5000 ? Wtf, the Q6600 is $100.

6. will

   November 5th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

   6

   Man its soo sick . Where do you get it?