<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smash Bros. Delayed&#8230; Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/</link>
	<description>Game News For the Masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:36:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rant Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/#comment-35564</link>
		<dc:creator>Rant Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/#comment-35564</guid>
		<description>2009?  I&#039;m guessing the editors just find proofreading to be over-rated and meant 2008.  At least by the tone of the rest of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009?  I&#8217;m guessing the editors just find proofreading to be over-rated and meant 2008.  At least by the tone of the rest of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Primed</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/#comment-35528</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Primed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/2008/01/10/smash-bros-delayed-again/#comment-35528</guid>
		<description>Just before, I wrote up an article about Smash Bros Brawl and one of the points that I mentioned was that Nintendo managed to cover up the previous delay very well by announcing Solid Snake and then continuing this with the Weekly updates. 

If the game is going to be delayed again, I wonder what they&#039;ll do to cover this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just before, I wrote up an article about Smash Bros Brawl and one of the points that I mentioned was that Nintendo managed to cover up the previous delay very well by announcing Solid Snake and then continuing this with the Weekly updates. </p>
<p>If the game is going to be delayed again, I wonder what they&#8217;ll do to cover this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
