<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Features Of The Next Gen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/</link>
	<description>Game News For the Masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:37:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top Links - ScooteringUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54991</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Links - ScooteringUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54991</guid>
		<description>[...] the Zii Is…Features Of The Next GenThe Dark Knight Producer Wants Sequel    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Zii Is…Features Of The Next GenThe Dark Knight Producer Wants Sequel    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54984</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54984</guid>
		<description>I think that the author meant that good online is about the features. I read it as connection stability (which is pretty bad for brawl). And I think that he is referingto how microsoft will pitch motion controls, and it will be the same way they pitched avatars. And he compared motions sesning to rumble, so the joystick analogy is pointless.

The one thing that sounds dumb is complaining about media playback. I think it&#039;s fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the author meant that good online is about the features. I read it as connection stability (which is pretty bad for brawl). And I think that he is referingto how microsoft will pitch motion controls, and it will be the same way they pitched avatars. And he compared motions sesning to rumble, so the joystick analogy is pointless.</p>
<p>The one thing that sounds dumb is complaining about media playback. I think it&#8217;s fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcbronco</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54982</link>
		<dc:creator>dcbronco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54982</guid>
		<description>@Hugh. Motion on anything but a Wii is a gimmick. Unless the others plan to go to a two piece controller, it will always be a gimmick. As far as when Microsoft used motion sensing, the fact that the author used quotes around discovery and advancement for something that Microsoft was ten years ago on is unfair. I don&#039;t know about their claims for avatars, but they were clearly ahead of the other two on motion sensing controllers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hugh. Motion on anything but a Wii is a gimmick. Unless the others plan to go to a two piece controller, it will always be a gimmick. As far as when Microsoft used motion sensing, the fact that the author used quotes around discovery and advancement for something that Microsoft was ten years ago on is unfair. I don&#8217;t know about their claims for avatars, but they were clearly ahead of the other two on motion sensing controllers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Ernst</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54976</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54976</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that, I accidentally hit enter after I typed in my uri...stupid stupid.  

@Hugh Isaacs II

I hate the PS3, because the downloads don&#039;t automatically start downloading in the background like on the 360, and when you want them to, you have to wait a while for it to load them into the background.  And even after you&#039;ve downloaded a game, you still have to wait a while for it to install.  On the 360, there is no installation time, it just works!!  So in my mind, from that, I think the PS3 sucks compared to the 360, just from the pov of downloading and playing demos.  So this isn&#039;t concerning the interface, it&#039;s concerning the amount of time being wasted on the players part.  I hate loading times, I HATE them!!!  So that&#039;s why I love the 360, because it doesn&#039;t make me wait like the PS3 does.  Of course maybe the new update fixed this, idk.  

I don&#039;t even have an XBox Live Gold Membership, so I&#039;m not talking about the consoles advantages of being online from a gamers perspective.  I haven&#039;t bought a gold membership because I didn&#039;t want to pay the $50, and I have lots of schoolwork todo; so the online would just get me distracted too much.  

Do you really think voice chat is just a tacked on gimick?  Microsoft has had chat features long before Sony.  If anything, Sony&#039;s is tacked on, just like their motion control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that, I accidentally hit enter after I typed in my uri&#8230;stupid stupid.  </p>
<p>@Hugh Isaacs II</p>
<p>I hate the PS3, because the downloads don&#8217;t automatically start downloading in the background like on the 360, and when you want them to, you have to wait a while for it to load them into the background.  And even after you&#8217;ve downloaded a game, you still have to wait a while for it to install.  On the 360, there is no installation time, it just works!!  So in my mind, from that, I think the PS3 sucks compared to the 360, just from the pov of downloading and playing demos.  So this isn&#8217;t concerning the interface, it&#8217;s concerning the amount of time being wasted on the players part.  I hate loading times, I HATE them!!!  So that&#8217;s why I love the 360, because it doesn&#8217;t make me wait like the PS3 does.  Of course maybe the new update fixed this, idk.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even have an XBox Live Gold Membership, so I&#8217;m not talking about the consoles advantages of being online from a gamers perspective.  I haven&#8217;t bought a gold membership because I didn&#8217;t want to pay the $50, and I have lots of schoolwork todo; so the online would just get me distracted too much.  </p>
<p>Do you really think voice chat is just a tacked on gimick?  Microsoft has had chat features long before Sony.  If anything, Sony&#8217;s is tacked on, just like their motion control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Ernst</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54975</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54975</guid>
		<description>@Hugh Isaacs II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hugh Isaacs II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lando</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54963</link>
		<dc:creator>Lando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54963</guid>
		<description>@Hugh Isaacs II
&quot;and regarding online being better, tacked on voice chat doesn’t make an online experience better...&quot;

You are kidding me right? Do you actually believe the only differences with online is the group voice chat feature?  If so, you might want to get familiar with what the competition offers before making that bold statement.

&quot;...and don’t tell me that the 360s servers are better because you’re paying for them, because I haven’t noticed lag or even dropping playing online on a PS3.&quot;

I don&#039;t know about you, but I have terrible lag when playing Little Big Planet online with others.  That seems to be a problem that others are having as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hugh Isaacs II<br />
&#8220;and regarding online being better, tacked on voice chat doesn’t make an online experience better&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You are kidding me right? Do you actually believe the only differences with online is the group voice chat feature?  If so, you might want to get familiar with what the competition offers before making that bold statement.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;and don’t tell me that the 360s servers are better because you’re paying for them, because I haven’t noticed lag or even dropping playing online on a PS3.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I have terrible lag when playing Little Big Planet online with others.  That seems to be a problem that others are having as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Isaacs II</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54932</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Isaacs II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54932</guid>
		<description>@Ernst
PS3s backwards compatibility could be fixed with a software update, it&#039;s not entirely gone.

and how can you tell if motion controls are precise or not (wouldn&#039;t that depend on the game you&#039;re playing) I mean, I don&#039;t own a PS3 or anything but I do know hardware and the PS3s accelerometer is actually better than the one&#039;s in Wii Remotes.

Regarding downloading content, I&#039;ve actually found the 360 to be more annoying, but really that&#039;s all in your own experience (especially with the question of internet connection).

and regarding online being better, tacked on voice chat doesn&#039;t make an online experience better, and don&#039;t tell me that the 360s servers are better because you&#039;re paying for them, because I haven&#039;t noticed lag or even dropping playing online on a PS3.

@nco
Saying motion sensors are a gimmick is like saying joysticks are gimmicks (think of it this way, a motion sensor is another form of input, it&#039;s like having a 3rd analog stick) and Microsoft having a motion controller ages ago doesn&#039;t account for now (and having a motion sensor in your controller doesn&#039;t mean every game will use it, it&#039;s still an option for developers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ernst<br />
PS3s backwards compatibility could be fixed with a software update, it&#8217;s not entirely gone.</p>
<p>and how can you tell if motion controls are precise or not (wouldn&#8217;t that depend on the game you&#8217;re playing) I mean, I don&#8217;t own a PS3 or anything but I do know hardware and the PS3s accelerometer is actually better than the one&#8217;s in Wii Remotes.</p>
<p>Regarding downloading content, I&#8217;ve actually found the 360 to be more annoying, but really that&#8217;s all in your own experience (especially with the question of internet connection).</p>
<p>and regarding online being better, tacked on voice chat doesn&#8217;t make an online experience better, and don&#8217;t tell me that the 360s servers are better because you&#8217;re paying for them, because I haven&#8217;t noticed lag or even dropping playing online on a PS3.</p>
<p>@nco<br />
Saying motion sensors are a gimmick is like saying joysticks are gimmicks (think of it this way, a motion sensor is another form of input, it&#8217;s like having a 3rd analog stick) and Microsoft having a motion controller ages ago doesn&#8217;t account for now (and having a motion sensor in your controller doesn&#8217;t mean every game will use it, it&#8217;s still an option for developers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GamerSushi Asks: Next Gen Features? &#124; GamerSushi</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54930</link>
		<dc:creator>GamerSushi Asks: Next Gen Features? &#124; GamerSushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54930</guid>
		<description>[...] about is what exactly is the next generation going to look like. Digital Battle has put together a Features of the Next Gen list, running through what they think belongs on all the new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about is what exactly is the next generation going to look like. Digital Battle has put together a Features of the Next Gen list, running through what they think belongs on all the new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcbronco</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54922</link>
		<dc:creator>dcbronco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54922</guid>
		<description>#1 would be cool. #2 Get over it. if you can&#039;t afford 50 bucks your broke ass shouldn&#039;t be gaming anyway. I prefer a network that works. #3 I agree. #4 I don&#039;t need to browse on my game machine, go to your damn computer. #5 I agree with that. #6 Microsoft actually did motion sensing ten years ago(see link) but other than Nintendo&#039;s implementation, it&#039;s all just gimmicky. I pretty much like my controller the way it is.

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1998/may98/devicepr.mspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 would be cool. #2 Get over it. if you can&#8217;t afford 50 bucks your broke ass shouldn&#8217;t be gaming anyway. I prefer a network that works. #3 I agree. #4 I don&#8217;t need to browse on my game machine, go to your damn computer. #5 I agree with that. #6 Microsoft actually did motion sensing ten years ago(see link) but other than Nintendo&#8217;s implementation, it&#8217;s all just gimmicky. I pretty much like my controller the way it is.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1998/may98/devicepr.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1998/may98/devicepr.mspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Ernst</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54921</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54921</guid>
		<description>@DDCGaming

Excuse me, but most PS3&#039;s aren&#039;t fully backwards compatible.  Remember, Sony removed the emulation chip from the PS3 to make it cheaper, so it can no longer play PS2 games.  And I&#039;m not sure about you, but the last time I used the PS3 motion controls, that didn&#039;t feel all that great.  I know the Wii controller isn&#039;t that precise either, but at least it&#039;s more solid than the PS3&#039;s gimic.  As for #2, 360&#039;s online is still much better than the PS3.  Plus the PS3 is very annoying to use when you want to download and  play demos (I don&#039;t know if the new PS3 Home update helped it or not); the 360 is much better in this area.  So I don&#039;t think the PS3 could qualify fully for #2, #5, or #6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DDCGaming</p>
<p>Excuse me, but most PS3&#8217;s aren&#8217;t fully backwards compatible.  Remember, Sony removed the emulation chip from the PS3 to make it cheaper, so it can no longer play PS2 games.  And I&#8217;m not sure about you, but the last time I used the PS3 motion controls, that didn&#8217;t feel all that great.  I know the Wii controller isn&#8217;t that precise either, but at least it&#8217;s more solid than the PS3&#8217;s gimic.  As for #2, 360&#8217;s online is still much better than the PS3.  Plus the PS3 is very annoying to use when you want to download and  play demos (I don&#8217;t know if the new PS3 Home update helped it or not); the 360 is much better in this area.  So I don&#8217;t think the PS3 could qualify fully for #2, #5, or #6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54919</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54919</guid>
		<description>So with the exception of maybe #1 and #3 you just described the PS3 my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So with the exception of maybe #1 and #3 you just described the PS3 my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDCGaming</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbattle.com/2009/01/08/features-of-the-next-gen/comment-page-1/#comment-54918</link>
		<dc:creator>DDCGaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=16833#comment-54918</guid>
		<description>Anyone notice PS3 has #2, #4, #5, and #6? Maybe not the best it could have but it has it. And by the way im not a fanboy. I have both PS3 and 360.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone notice PS3 has #2, #4, #5, and #6? Maybe not the best it could have but it has it. And by the way im not a fanboy. I have both PS3 and 360.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
